The report was completed in 2008, but was never made public.
But now, Ontario, Canada's largest court system and the only one in the country to specifically legislate a ban on cameras, is opening the door to delivering trials to the public via the small screen.
In an interview with The Canadian Press, Ontario's attorney general says he's open to the idea of allowing cameras in courtrooms and says the time is right to canvas judges, Crown attorneys and defence lawyers on their opinions.
But Peter Kormos, a lawyer and the justice critic for Ontario's Air Max Tavas Limited Edition
Several other appeal courts across the country have allowed cameras in on a few occasions, but there is no place in Canada where it is accepted as a regular practice in a trial setting.
The only caveat was the potential that sensitive information could be released inadvertently and the high capital cost of installing the cameras.
Cameras were also allowed in that year for Steven Truscott's appeal of his 1959 murder conviction.
"We now have the means to change that."
"The reality is that we all communicate audiovisually from virtually every part of our lives," he said.
Other concerns put forward in the cameras in courts debate include: a potential chill on witness testimony, grandstanding by lawyers who like to mug for the cameras, the potential distraction to trial participants and TV coverage that might focus only on sensational cases, thereby diminishing the dignity of the courts.
CBC lawyer Daniel Henry has been at the forefront of that push and in a 1985 paper he wrote on electronic public access to court he advances many of the same arguments he is still making today.
A report commissioned by Bentley's ministry to evaluate the success of a 2007 project that temporarily put cameras in Ontario's Court of Appeal branded the pilot an overwhelming success, and the vast majority of those canvassed recommended expanding camera use to all Ontario courts.
"I am prepared to speak with the judiciary about their interest in having the discussion at this point in time, where we would go, and canvass the views of other participants in the justice system."
Media said the cameras promoted transparency and reduced the risk of errors and bias in reporting. "They also stated that the DVD record is a significant improvement on the current tools of the trade, which are limited to notepads, a BlackBerry and an artist's sketch pad," the report said.
The idea was by no means new. For decades, advocates for an open justice system have been pushing to get cameras in courts.
"It brings us into the 21st century and I think people who are concerned as we should always be about confidence in the justice system would want to see televised trials as quickly as possible."
Only one of the cases generated media interest Nike Air Max 2015 Mens Total Black Wolf Gray Silver
"I'm open. I know in the United States we see things televised all the time. There's very much a culture of televising. Society doesn't seem to have fallen apart as a result of it (although) we're probably a long way from that reality," he added.
Attorney general willing to consider cameras in courts
that of William Mullins Johnson, who was wrongly convicted of killing his four year old niece but the court's website saw a "dramatic increase" in public visits during the project, the report found.
"I'm interested in the views of people as to whether we should move forward," Bentley said.
"In Canada today, despite eloquent statements by eminent jurists about the value of an open court system, our court proceedings are not truly 'public,' " Henry wrote in 1985 in favour of having cameras in courts.
Bentley and a ministry Nike Air Max 2015 Lime Green spokesman raised several concerns surrounding cameras in courts, including privacy, especially of children and victims; the safety of participants; security; the administration of justice and costs.
The Court of Appeal pilot project was borne of a recommendation in 2006 from a panel on justice and Nike Air Max 2015 Shoes
Obtained by The Canadian Press through a freedom of information request, the report recommended the attorney general amend the Courts of Justice Act to allow the use of cameras in Ontario courts, saying their images have "great potential" as a learning tool for students and lawyers.
Simpson trial, have come to expect.
Now, 26 years later, Henry said he still thinks it's inevitable that cameras will one day allow the public to watch proceedings in Ontario courts. Slow as it may be, Henry said, the trend is certainly moving in that direction, especially with the proliferation of cameras in smartphones and other technology.
New Democrats, says having cameras in courtrooms would bolster the openness of courts and accessibility to justice.
the media, with representatives from print and broadcast journalism, lawyer and police associations, the assistant deputy attorney general and an Appeal Court judge.
The $365,000 pilot project webcast 21 cases in the fall of 2007.
Kormos said there are simple ways to address concerns such as privacy, as courts already protect the identity of alleged young offenders and sexual assault victims.
Nike Air Max Tavas Junior
Nike Air Max Thea Khaki Womens
Nike Air Total Max Uptempo Amazon
Nike Basketball Shoes 2014 Lebron
Nike Dunk Ultra Umbrella
Nike Air Max Tavas White Mono
Nike Blazer Low Gt Qs
Nike Air Max Thea Premium Leather Sneakers
White Air Max 2015
Womens Nike Air Max Thea White And Black
Nike Air Max 2015 Grey Blue
Grey Nike Air Max Tavas
Air Max Shoes 2015 For Men
Nike Dunk Sky Hi Wedge Black Suede
Nike Air Max 2015 Blue Black