It is time for education funding reform from our Legislature and governor and instructive leadership from the Agency of Education. They have been entrusted with our property taxes to fairly, sustainably and optimally fund education across our state. They need to address what only they can fix Act 68.
Sweeping consolidation is not the solution. To dismantle the education system that has drawn many families to our state would be hugely disruptive and risk further loss of students and taxpayers.
Consolidation is the one idea to contain education costs that is gaining serious ground in Montpelier.
Community based schools should be and can be sustainable in Vermont if we face up to the real underlying problems driving rising costs in our education system. The boldness and goals of Act 68 are commendable. However, we need to stop ignoring its flaws. We need to eliminate its tragedy of the commons, which drives up budgets, put the brakes on unfunded mandates from Montpelier, implement incentives for cost containment, and promote and safeguard best practices in cost effective and high impact education delivery.
These offsets include state and federal funds for special education, English as a second language, and free and reduced lunch populations. They include fund balances and public and private grants to support particular initiatives, investments or populations.
So while our Legislature and governor fail to address the root problems in the implementation of Act 68, we find ourselves at the threshold of shattering our statewide education governance structures and the school and central office leadership, which certainly have played a role in helping us routinely rank near the very top in education outcomes in the United States. How is it wise to implement such sweeping centralization of control on false premises and an unstable, untended foundation?
The agenda to force statewide consolidation is not based upon a clear understanding of spending and outcomes. The aggressive consolidation agenda is driven by continued use of Act 68 funding constructs, which cloak real spending and real costs drivers and promote false hope as Nike Air Max Thea Jcrd
It is only owing to Act 68 constructs that these larger districts appear significantly more cost effective (and are held responsible for less of the education funding Women Air Max Thea
The impact of using these constructs to evaluate how expensive or efficient a school district seems is shown in the accompanying chart, based upon fiscal year 2014 data.
Equalized pupils are also not equivalent to actual student counts. In the equalized pupil formula, different types of students are weighted differently, and many of the heavier weightings are based upon the same factors Air Max Shoes For Women 2015
In fact, many large school districts are spending just as much or more than many much smaller schools do. The Act 68 funding system totally clouds this fact.
With this basic look at the raw data, does consolidation really look like the best cost containment strategy for us today? Further, does it seem Act 68 is helping us fairly allocate resources and tax burden? Does it seem the right foundation to build education policy around, despite how it obscures spending and accountability?
While it is highly unlikely that there are no opportunities to reduce costs and improve opportunities and outcomes through carefully targeted consolidation, it is wholesale, forced consolidation that is being proposed in our Legislature.
Bad data underpins talk of consolidation
The reason consolidation looks so appealing is because we have come to view everything through the lens of Act 68, which measures all schools by what is called education spending per equalized pupil.
Bills in the Legislature, reports out of the Agency of Education and the stated goals of the state Board of Education all support consolidation as the key to reducing education spending in Vermont. In fact, they should be addressing the underlying problems with the implementation of Act 68.
Our highly complex formula hides the facts in the following way: Education spending reflects actual expenditures, minus a wide variety of revenue offsets.
to the savings consolidation will deliver.
When you consider total expenditures per student as opposed to the Act 68 constructs, you can see that some of our largest school districts are far from more cost effective in delivering education.
that drive qualification for revenue offsets: special education, ESL, and free and reduced lunch needs.
burden). These measures undermine our ability to understand actual spending, actual cost drivers and the impact of our relative investments. We need to look at the right data to get a handle on spending.
Through that lens, large schools look like they spend significantly less per student than small schools. They look like they spend more along the lines of what is spent in neighboring states, as Nike Air Max Thea Pink Orange if economies of scale make a difference for us today.
Nike Basketball Shoes For Men
Nike Dunk Fish Ladder
Nike Air Max Thea Print Running Shoes
Nike Air Max Tavas Size 4
Nike Zoom Uptempo 3.0
2015 Air Max 90
Air Max Thea Triple Black
Nike Thea White Mens
Air Max Thea Leather Sneakers
Air Max Thea Womens
Grey Nike Air Max 2015
Nike Air Max Thea Dark Grey
Nike Dunk Waterproof
Nike Air Uptempo Chicago Bulls
Nike Air Max Tavas Infant